campdracula5eva:

BEST THING EVER WE DON’T NEED ANY MORE THINGS THIS IS THE BEST THING

campdracula5eva:

BEST THING EVER WE DON’T NEED ANY MORE THINGS THIS IS THE BEST THING

(Source: fassbenderregrets)

deutschemark:

regencyduchess:

Whilst in Sydney in 1994, a man apparently tries to assassinate Prince Charles. And not a single fuck was given by His Royal Highness.

(x)

Menstrual pads have been mentioned as early as the 10th century, in the Suda, where Hypatia, who lived in the 4th century AD, was said to have thrown one of her used menstrual rags at an admirer in an attempt to discourage him

if you don’t think history is a truly inspiring subject you’re wrong (via fashiondisastercecil)

I have to add, this wasn’t just a case of a pretty woman got advanced on by a man she didn’t want. He wasn’t just an admirer. He was her student. She was a master at mathematics, astronomy, and philosophy. She had popular public lectures.

And she wasn’t just said to throw her menstrual rags at him. The story I read was that he admitted his admiration in the middle of one of her teachings, and she grabbed her menstrual rags right out from in between her legs, hurled it at him, and told him “This is what you really love, my young man, but you do not love beauty for its own sake.” 

It wasn’t just an attempt to discourage him. It was teaching him a lesson, even when he was interrupting hers.

Basically, Hypatia was amazing.

(via skaldadottir)

(Source: orcasoup)

I’m going to make a very firm statement right now: The only people who have the right to define what bisexuality is are people who identify as bisexual. If they were to come to a major consensus to say “Yes, bisexuality refers to loving two genders or two sexes, and only that” then it would be one thing. It’s also different from bisexuals who say “I am bisexual because I am interested in both men and women.” Instead, a definition is being pushed onto bisexuals by people who do not identify with the label rather than by people who identify with it.

As pansexuals, this is something that needs to stop. We are perfectly capable of defining ourselves without automatically framing it as an alternative to bisexuality. And we are perfectly capable of responding to the inevitable “…so, you’re bi then?” responses with “no, I do not identify with that” rather than “but bisexuals are binarists/transphobic/only open to two genders!” Until we do that, we are perpetuating the same devaluation of identity that causes some bisexuals to make ignorant statements that pansexuals are just hipster bisexuals who want to be special snowflakes. If you oppose pansexuality being defined as an attention-seeking form of bisexuality for hipsters, don’t make the same mistake by giving self-congratulatory definitions of bisexuality.

lescheveuxoranges:

I have some free time so I animated Katara waterbending

lescheveuxoranges:

I have some free time so I animated Katara waterbending

(Source: eoix)

If Daenerys and Margaery were ever to meet, do you think that they woud get along or would there be some tension between them?

(Source: stormborns)

tellusanotherstory:

A how to make flower crowns with dandelions. Not sure if it will work on other flowers, but as long as the stalk/pedicel is long it should be alright O v O
Also I hope it’s understandable ahah

paleobiology:

Not the best photo ever but here’s my allosaurus tattoo!

paleobiology:

Not the best photo ever but here’s my allosaurus tattoo!

(Source: genderoftheday)

(Source: bbuchanann)

theswinginsixties:

Mama Cass Elliot

theswinginsixties:

Mama Cass Elliot